Picture credit: harvard law blogs
Women: How does the title of this blog make you feel? Does it make you seethe with rage as you reach to whip off your bra with one hand and strike a match with another? Perhaps it makes you think "Oh dear, silly, wasteful fanciful me, contemplating matters of feminist principle when the laundry basket is overflowing and I've yet to start making the dinner ready for when my man comes home". Or perhaps you think, 'Meh, it's not funny when that odious old bloke on that advert says it either. Move on please"
Hard to know how to react isn't it? Indeed, should we even be reacting at all?
On the drive home I was listening to Nicky Campbell's Radio 5 Live show and there were folk from all walks of life getting their knickers in a knot over whether David Cameron should be lambasted for what some have called a patronising and sexist put down.
There are those, including a female comedian whose name I didn't catch but is apparently very funny on her You Tube videos (but not on radio, it seems) who was absolutely outraged. So outraged that she launched into what another caller called a 'thesis' on why women shouldn't be denigrated in this inappropriate manner in that great chamber of debate, The House of Commons. It was a stirring speech and I must admit that my eye did momentarily rest upon the cigarette lighter as my hand simultaneously drifted towards my bra clasp as I adjusted the seat belt strap that had been bugging me for the whole journey. Aye, bra burning on the A46, what stronger gesture of feminist power could one possibly make as I had dropped my man off to work and my daughter at nursery as I drove home via the shop to pick up some Diet coke, a chocolate doughnut and a copy of Grazia?
Of course the inevitable other side of the debate exclaimed disbelief at a "world gawwwwn maaad" as the "PC brigade" come down hard on a piece of lighthearted friendly banter.
So should we as women be livid that in this day and age we can still have our serious political questions to the Prime Minister of this country dismissed with a simple "calm down, dear"? Or should we shrug and say "it was a joke, if not a very funny one, let's just move on, shall we?"
I'm in two minds. On the one hand I see the feminist anger at such a dismissal taking place in this context. It was not playground or office banter, it was the place where the public are meant to be watching democracy in action as those governing are questioned and held to account. Women have fought hard to be seen as equal, and even though there is no doubt in my mind that Mr Cameron didn't intend to be sexist, the very fact that he uttered such a phrase (the term 'dear' being the offensive part) somehow makes it okay for anyone to utter such dismissals in the guise of 'humour'. But on the other, I feel that as women we've come so far that this kind of thing is hardly going to set us back generations. Male politicians above a certain age that have been to public school are never going to be the most progressively liberal-minded lot and although they're meant to be role models, they're certainly not going to be emulated by the younger male generation to the same extent that misogynistic footballers probably are.
So it's a difficult one. Whether to be annoyed or not at something which was meant to be funny, but in the way of The Office's David Brent, totally missed the mark? Probably not.
What do you think?
Women: How does the title of this blog make you feel? Does it make you seethe with rage as you reach to whip off your bra with one hand and strike a match with another? Perhaps it makes you think "Oh dear, silly, wasteful fanciful me, contemplating matters of feminist principle when the laundry basket is overflowing and I've yet to start making the dinner ready for when my man comes home". Or perhaps you think, 'Meh, it's not funny when that odious old bloke on that advert says it either. Move on please"
Hard to know how to react isn't it? Indeed, should we even be reacting at all?
On the drive home I was listening to Nicky Campbell's Radio 5 Live show and there were folk from all walks of life getting their knickers in a knot over whether David Cameron should be lambasted for what some have called a patronising and sexist put down.
There are those, including a female comedian whose name I didn't catch but is apparently very funny on her You Tube videos (but not on radio, it seems) who was absolutely outraged. So outraged that she launched into what another caller called a 'thesis' on why women shouldn't be denigrated in this inappropriate manner in that great chamber of debate, The House of Commons. It was a stirring speech and I must admit that my eye did momentarily rest upon the cigarette lighter as my hand simultaneously drifted towards my bra clasp as I adjusted the seat belt strap that had been bugging me for the whole journey. Aye, bra burning on the A46, what stronger gesture of feminist power could one possibly make as I had dropped my man off to work and my daughter at nursery as I drove home via the shop to pick up some Diet coke, a chocolate doughnut and a copy of Grazia?
Of course the inevitable other side of the debate exclaimed disbelief at a "world gawwwwn maaad" as the "PC brigade" come down hard on a piece of lighthearted friendly banter.
So should we as women be livid that in this day and age we can still have our serious political questions to the Prime Minister of this country dismissed with a simple "calm down, dear"? Or should we shrug and say "it was a joke, if not a very funny one, let's just move on, shall we?"
I'm in two minds. On the one hand I see the feminist anger at such a dismissal taking place in this context. It was not playground or office banter, it was the place where the public are meant to be watching democracy in action as those governing are questioned and held to account. Women have fought hard to be seen as equal, and even though there is no doubt in my mind that Mr Cameron didn't intend to be sexist, the very fact that he uttered such a phrase (the term 'dear' being the offensive part) somehow makes it okay for anyone to utter such dismissals in the guise of 'humour'. But on the other, I feel that as women we've come so far that this kind of thing is hardly going to set us back generations. Male politicians above a certain age that have been to public school are never going to be the most progressively liberal-minded lot and although they're meant to be role models, they're certainly not going to be emulated by the younger male generation to the same extent that misogynistic footballers probably are.
So it's a difficult one. Whether to be annoyed or not at something which was meant to be funny, but in the way of The Office's David Brent, totally missed the mark? Probably not.
What do you think?












